Liveware Publishing Support Forum

Problem finally solved. R&R works like a charm, but my data base doesn^t. The problem came from empty fields in my data base. One of the root-level calculations involves the log function, which was trying to take the log of zero. Even though those records were not being printed, because they did...

Sounds to me like a topic for future features! That^s a particular problem with R&R that drives me crazy. The subtotals are nearly always irrelevant once you insert a group, aren^t they now.

Hey, I wonder if I have a similar problem (that^s driving me crazy). I^m using R&R Xbase 8.1.027 in Win2000, 512M RAM on a set of FoxPro data bases. I have some conditional totals that are not computing correctly, and in fact sometimes print out as "*****". I can^t even use computation...

By "next release" do you mean the existing version 9, or a new release for 8.1?

Yes, as a matter of fact, that would get me half-way there. Is there a way to do that?

Nearly all of my dbfs and reports have a hundred or more calculated variables and/or total fields. When I go to insert a variable into a report design, it would be great to have an autofill feature, so that I don^t have to either scroll through the variable list looking for my particular variable or...

In the same problem, when I get a valid value of zero for the (normally miscalculated) variable, the function STR(variable name,5) gives me a blank instead of a zero. All the other similar valid zeroes give me a STR output of "0" like they should.____HELP!____p.s. I just updated my version...

Okay, Kathleen, here^s another one. I have several rows of calculated variables of similar nature. The calculation of interest (problem?) is based on the value of another calculated value and a total field. All but one of the calculated variables is correct, but one is not. I even print on the same ...

That is true because in a multiscan each composite record will have values from only one child table.____So if I am scanning charges and payments____CUST CHG->DATE PAY->DATE__123 01/01/2002__123 01/15/2002__456 01/10/2002__456 01/12/2002____A query for CHG->DATE ={01/*/2002} will never be met by any...

I am developing a report for which I need multiple, nested scanning, including 3 scans of the same FOX PRO dbf pair. Every thing runs fine for 1 nested (scan related to another scanned dbf) of one dbf and 2 nested scans of the same (different from the above one) dbf. When I relate another nested sca...